Turning these concepts into a Proposal

The research questions:  

1.  How will access to the internet and accessible mesh networks benefit children in poverty ridden areas?  And how will the community benefit?

2.  Blogging is given a high level of importance in groups like Project Ceibal and the FOKO Blog Club (check previous posts).  For giving these children a sense of agency in global discourse, is this an appropriate genre?  Because it is a product of western discourse ideologies, is this another form of colonialism?  Is agency being defined by the western colonial powers or by the blogger?

3.  Are appropriate products being created for local collaborative problems solving and global outreach?  By products, I am referring to anything from the structural elements needed to set up a local mesh network, to the mesh network it self, to various communication platforms (wikis, blogs, SNSs, MMOs, etc).

4.  In global collaborative problem solving, how are people building agency and trust in these virtual environments?  This is somewhat related to question 2.  

5.  How are these children learning to use the technologies?  

Possible Theoretical Frameworks:  

I see activity theory playing a big role in this project in some contextual task based analysis.  So, what kinds of tasks do these agents have to perform in these  environments on a daily basis, and how does connectivity (OLPC) fit into this discourse?  Along with this, I will be reflecting on concepts of user-centered design and David Dobrin's definition of technical writing:  "Writing that accommodates the technology to the user"  (118).  

I will be reflecting on post-colonialism, contrastive rhetorics, and Lisa Nakumura's conception of Cybertyping.  

The purpose of the project is to analyze all the facets--agency, contextual task analysis, technology accommodation--that are arising out of this push to create universal connectivity.  Hopefully, this project will yield results that cause us to questions the ways in which power relationships affect the agency of individuals.  Because collaboration is occurring across cultural and national divides, the ways in which agency and trust is build is directly related to the methods of cross-cultural collaboration and problem solving.  Also, this study is designed to analyze the communication tools (products) being used to harbor and facilitate collaboration and communication.        

Works Cited

Dobrin, David. "What's Technical About Technical Writing?" in Central Works in Technical Communication. 

Nakumura, Lisa Cybertypes:  Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. 

Trust and Agency in Global Collaborative Problem Solving

Possibly something else to consider with globalized connectivity and global collaboration to solve local and global problems via new interactive, collaborative technologies may be the concept of building agency among minority participants and the process by which trust is build over distance collaboration.  

Barbara Mirel and Nicholoas Johnson's recent article "Social Determinants of Preparing a Cyber-Infrastructure Innovation for Diffusion" (Technical Communication Quarterly 15(3) pg 329-353) may add to this discussion on a global scale.  Particularly I am interested in their application of "Dramatic Analysis," which they describe as " As a rhetorical methodology, dramatistic analysis presumes that textual exchanges make certain realities present to participants and leave others out. People exchanging these texts choose some emphases and omit others to get readers to go along with them" (337).  

The question that remains is this: What cultural factors (specifically referring to the post-colonialism and the identity of the "other") will determine how agents emphasize and de-emphasize content for the sake of consensus?  Or, how are various power balances going to work out in global collaborations by NGOs?

Posting on the XO

Currently I am blogging on the XO while y class is watching a presentation by Howard Reingold who is talking about collaboration and new media. It is quite optimistic about the way in which people will collaborate to solve problems that span cultural, discursive, and national lines. I hope my students, who represent five different nations, will take away a greater understanding about the posibility for shared actions and oppotunities for transcendence.

Please excuse typos and spelling; this is a small keyboard.

Essential Questions for Research

Well, I guess the essential question that I am asking in this project is what exactly is the ultimate goal of connectivity?  Then, based on that goal, are we creating the efficient avenues to achieving those goals.  Essentially, what kinds of discursive products are being used, re-contextualized, or produced to accomplish these goals.  Blogging is a discursive product that has essentially be re-contextualized by Ceibal, and they have had some problems in accomplishing their goals of putting the voices of their students out there.  So is blogging the write discursive product or do we have to produce something else.  Or do we have to re-imagine the genre.  Or does it have to be used in conjunction with some other avenues.    

Rising Voices is not only concerned with student blogs but also the with creation of a digital infrastructure to poor, rural communities in the third world.  Thinking about the theoretical framework for this study I think we are looking at discourse, genre analysis and community information infrastructure.  This last one would possibly relate to an extension of community literacies.  Looking too at communication technologies and digital community network setup as products of discourse.  An interesting turn may be to look at the way in which new products arise in a discourse.  Does the ideology change or does the available means of production change.    

The XO, access, and the availability of the means of production.

I haven't posted on this blog in a while but my recent resurgent interest in discourse analysis and the means of production have lead me to topic in question again.  Hopefully this line of questioning will lean me to a conference proposal or paper.  

I have reflected many times on the Ceibal project in Uruguay.  One of the fundamental efforts of the project was to create a system of blogs that created a network for school children to communicate and collaborate.  I have done some work that considers blogging to be a Euro-American, western conception, which reinforces colonial ideals of communication, rhetoric, discourse, memoria (or the way in which information/knowledge and stored and retrieved), genre, and collaboration.  These notebooks, while giving access and connectivity to these underprivileged children, are made to adapt to a colonial discourse.  

But these laptops allow for users to write their own applications.  The Ceibal project actually wanted to create a blogging application that would be suitable for the users after failed attempts with blogger.  There has been no reports on the headway with that project (I actually created this blog on the XO).  There has been much debate over how effective blogging is as platform of education.  So this issue may be a question of who is controlling the means of production.  Why is the blogging genre being produced in this context?  Is there a more effective, anti-colonial genre that can serve the needs of this discourse community?    

I see this as possibly a usability study (or part of one).  Analyzing the context and coming up with product or a means of production that leads to efficient communication and accomplishment of discursive goals.